1. PixelPlaygroundHome
  2. Metaverse Insights

Judge bans SBF from using VPN during house arrest

• Metaverse Insights • 162 views

It is reported that after SBF said that he used private network to watch the Super Bowl game during house arrest, a judge banned Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) from u…

Judge bans SBF from using VPN during house arrest

It is reported that after SBF said that he used private network to watch the Super Bowl game during house arrest, a judge banned Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) from using VPN. U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan wrote, “The defendant’s use of VPN will bring many of the same risks as his use of encrypted messages or call applications.” This move was made at the time when SBF’s lawyer and prosecutor negotiated his bail terms. After SBF was accused of contacting potential witnesses in its criminal case, the judge recently banned SBF from using encrypted message applications such as Signal. SBF is also prohibited from contacting current or former FTX employees until his bail conditions are resolved. The lawyer asked Kaplan to extend the deadline for filing new bail conditions to Friday, but the judge refused. According to Kaplan’s order, the opinion on the conditions of SBF bail will be submitted on Wednesday, and the court will hear the debate on this issue on Thursday afternoon.

SBF is prohibited from using VPN, and the bail debate is scheduled to be held on Thursday

Interpretation of the news:


Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) has been banned from using virtual private networks (VPN) by a U.S. judge while he is under house arrest. The judge, Lewis Kaplan, stated that the risks associated with the use of VPNs are similar to that of encrypted messaging or call applications. This decision comes after SBF was accused of contacting potential witnesses in his criminal case, resulting in the judge banning him from using encrypted messaging applications like Signal. SBF is also not allowed to contact current or former FTX employees until his bail conditions are resolved.

The ruling was made during negotiations on SBF’s bail terms, when his lawyer requested an extension for filing new bail conditions. Kaplan however refused, and suggested that the opinion on SBF’s bail conditions would be submitted on Wednesday with a hearing set for Thursday afternoon. It is clear that the judge is taking a cautious approach in order to protect the integrity of the case against SBF.

The use of VPNs has increased significantly in recent years, in large part due to the rise of remote working. VPNs are commonly used to establish secure and encrypted connections to private networks, and are popular among businesses and individuals alike. However, they can also be used to access illegal or restricted content, which is why their use is often regulated or banned altogether.

SBF’s case is an example of how using VPNs can be perceived as breaching bail conditions, and highlights the potential risks associated with these services. By banning SBF from using VPNs or encrypted messaging applications, Judge Kaplan is sending a clear message that the court will not tolerate any attempts to sway the outcome of the case.

In conclusion, the decision to ban SBF from using VPNs while he is under house arrest is a significant development in his case. This ruling shows that the court is taking an active role in monitoring SBF’s activities and ensuring that he adheres to his bail conditions. While the future of SBF’s case remains uncertain, it is clear that Judge Kaplan is not willing to take any chances when it comes to protecting the integrity of the legal process.

This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent Fpips's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.fpips.com/417/

It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.

Like (0)
Previous 02/15/2023 20:50
Next 02/15/2023 21:23

Recommended articles