The Limits of Cryptocurrency Regulation

According to reports, Jake Chervinsky, the policy director of the American non-profit organization Blockchain Association, said on social media on Tuesday that…

The Limits of Cryptocurrency Regulation

According to reports, Jake Chervinsky, the policy director of the American non-profit organization Blockchain Association, said on social media on Tuesday that neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has the authority to comprehensively regulate cryptocurrencies. Chervinsky said that 2022 was the worst year in the history of cryptocurrency, because the collapse of FTX.com, a cryptocurrency exchange headquartered in the Bahamas, had caused great damage to the reputation of the industry and led skeptics to rush to supervise. The ideological differences between Republicans and Democrats in the House of Representatives delayed the debate on the regulation of digital assets, which led agencies to expand their powers beyond recognition in order to complete their work without Congress, whether or not permitted by law.

Policy director of the Blockchain Association: neither the SEC nor the CFTC has the right to comprehensively supervise cryptocurrency

Interpretation of the news:


Cryptocurrency regulation has been a topic of debate among regulators and industry players for a long time. While some countries have implemented strict regulations, others have taken a more hands-off approach, resulting in a patchwork of regulations that vary from country to country. In the United States, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) are the primary regulatory bodies responsible for overseeing the cryptocurrency market. However, according to Jake Chervinsky, the policy director of the non-profit organization Blockchain Association, these agencies do not have comprehensive authority to regulate cryptocurrencies.

Chervinsky’s comments came in response to the collapse of FTX.com, a cryptocurrency exchange headquartered in the Bahamas. He pointed out that the incident had caused significant damage to the industry’s reputation, which led skeptics to demand more regulation. This, in turn, has led to an expansion of regulatory powers beyond what is legally permitted. Chervinsky argued that this situation had arisen due to the ideological differences between Republicans and Democrats in the House of Representatives, which delayed the debate on regulation of digital assets. As a result, agencies had taken it upon themselves to expand their powers to complete their work without Congress.

Chervinsky’s comments highlight the limitations of existing cryptocurrency regulation. The regulatory landscape is complex, and it can be challenging to determine how to regulate a market that is still in its infancy. While regulators have taken steps to mitigate risk and protect investors, the lack of comprehensive regulation has contributed to the growth of fraud and scams in the cryptocurrency market, which has led to skepticism and mistrust among traditional investors.

In conclusion, Chervinsky’s comments serve as an important reminder that regulation is not a panacea for all the problems facing the cryptocurrency market. While regulators have a crucial role to play in ensuring market integrity, they must also strike a balance between protecting investors and allowing innovation to flourish. As such, the cryptocurrency market requires careful and considered regulation that takes into account its unique characteristics and challenges. Only then can the industry earn the trust of traditional investors and fully realize its potential.

This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent Fpips's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.fpips.com/607/

It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.