1. PixelPlaygroundHome
  2. Web3 News

The number of primary network addresses of zkSync Era has exceeded 160000, and the number of cross chain ETHs has exceeded 34000

• Web3 News • 130 views

According to reports, according to Dune data, as of March 30, the number of single addresses on the zkSync Era chain had reached 160351, and 34188 ETHs had entered the zkSync Era n

The number of primary network addresses of zkSync Era has exceeded 160000, and the number of cross chain ETHs has exceeded 34000

According to reports, according to Dune data, as of March 30, the number of single addresses on the zkSync Era chain had reached 160351, and 34188 ETHs had entered the zkSync Era network across the chain, with an average of about 0.2 ETHs stored per address.

The number of primary network addresses of zkSync Era has exceeded 160000, and the number of cross chain ETHs has exceeded 34000

I. Introduction
– Explanation of zkSync Era chain
– Importance of single addresses
II. The Significance of the Number of Single Addresses on the zkSync Era Chain
– Explanation of the increase in the number of single addresses
– Benefits of having more single addresses
– Limitations of single address usage
III. The Need for ETH Storing in the zkSync Era Network
– Explanation of the network
– Benefits of storing ETH in zkSync Era on a single address
– Comparison with other networks
IV. Analysis of the Data on the zkSync Era Chain
– Interpretation of the data provided by Dune Analytics
– Implications of the data analysis
– Factors that contribute to the data trends
V. Conclusion
– Summary of key points
– Implications of the data on the future of the zkSync Era chain
– Future outlook

According to Reports, the Number of Single Addresses on the zkSync Era Chain Surged to Over 160,000

The increase in the number of single addresses on the zkSync Era chain has been a topic of discussion in the crypto world for some time now. According to Dune data, as of March 30, the number of single addresses on the zkSync Era chain had reached 160,351, and 34,188 ETHs had entered the zkSync Era network across the chain, with an average of about 0.2 ETHs stored per address.

The Significance of the Number of Single Addresses on the zkSync Era Chain

The surge in the number of single addresses on the zkSync Era chain has significant implications. Single addresses on the zkSync Era chain allow users to store their Ethereum (ETH) assets in a more streamlined and efficient manner compared to other networks. There are several benefits of having more single addresses, such as better user experience, more efficient transactions, increased network capacity, and improved scalability.
However, single addresses are not without their limitations. One primary limitation is that they are not entirely secure, as they rely on the security of the user’s private key. If the user’s private key is compromised, the account is at risk of being hacked, resulting in the loss of funds.

The Need for ETH Storing in the zkSync Era Network

The zkSync Era network provides a more efficient, scalable, and cost-effective alternative to other Ethereum-based networks. The network allows for faster transactions and lower transaction fees, making it an attractive option for storing ETH assets. Compared to storing ETH assets on other networks, storing ETH assets on the zkSync Era network, especially on a single address, offers several benefits, including faster transaction times, lower fees, and increased scalability.

Analysis of the Data on the zkSync Era Chain

The surge in the number of single addresses and the amount of ETH stored in the zkSync Era network has significant implications for the future of the network. The data provided by Dune Analytics indicates that the trend of more users utilizing the network is increasing. However, there are several factors that contributed to this trend, including the recent surge in ETH prices and the network’s recent update.

Conclusion

The surge in the number of single addresses and the amount of ETH stored in the zkSync Era network demonstrates the network’s growing popularity in the crypto world. The increased adoption of this network has significant implications for the future of the network, as it could lead to increased network capacity, improved scalability, and more efficient transactions. However, it is vital to acknowledge the limitations of using a single address, such as the risk of theft or hacking.

FAQs

1. What is the zkSync Era chain, and how does it differ from traditional Ethereum networks?
2. Is it better to store ETH assets on the zkSync Era network or traditional Ethereum networks?
3. What are the limitations of using a single address on the zkSync Era chain?

This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent Fpips's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.fpips.com/11613/

It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.

Like (0)
Previous 03/30/2023 04:34
Next 03/30/2023 05:03

Recommended articles