The US government has suspended the “substantial evidence based on the merits” submitted in the sale of Voyager to Binance.US

According to reports, according to court documents of the Southern District Court of New York, the United States government displayed \”a substantial case on the merits\” in its prop

The US government has suspended the substantial evidence based on the merits submitted in the sale of Voyager to Binance.US

According to reports, according to court documents of the Southern District Court of New York, the United States government displayed “a substantial case on the merits” in its proposal to suspend the sale of Voyager’s assets to Binance.US. Failure to suspend the transaction would cause irreparable damage. The document concludes that District Judge Jennifer Rearden of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York decided to speed up the briefing and ruling on the appeal, and set a deadline for the sale of Voyager to Binance.US to avoid too long a delay. He requested the government to submit its briefing before April 7. The Voyager Debtors and Creditors Committee should submit a briefing on April 14, and the government should respond to Voyager before April 18.

The US government has suspended the “substantial evidence based on the merits” submitted in the sale of Voyager to Binance.US

I. Introduction
– Brief overview of the situation
– Purpose of the article
II. The Case Against Binance.US
– The evidence presented by the US government
– The potential irreparable damage caused by the transaction
III. The Court’s Decision
– The reasons behind the court’s decision
– The importance of setting a deadline
IV. The Role of Voyager Debtors and Creditors Committee
– The committee’s involvement in the case
– Significance of their response
V. Possible Outcomes
– The potential impact of the court’s decision
– Speculation about future developments
VI. Conclusion
– Summary of the article
– Final thoughts
FAQs:
1. What was the US government’s argument against the sale of Voyager’s assets to Binance.US?
2. Why was it important for the court to set a deadline for the decision?
3. What could be the possible long-term effects of the court’s decision?

This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent Fpips's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.fpips.com/12684/

It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.