US Authorities Postpone Civil Action Against SBF Until Criminal Charges Resolved

It is reported that a judge has approved the request of the United States Attorney for the United States Commodity Futures Commission (CFTC) to postpone the ci…

US Authorities Postpone Civil Action Against SBF Until Criminal Charges Resolved

It is reported that a judge has approved the request of the United States Attorney for the United States Commodity Futures Commission (CFTC) to postpone the civil action against SBF. In a document submitted last week, the prosecutor asked the judge to postpone the civil fraud lawsuit filed by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and CFTC against SBF until the end of its criminal charges. The prosecutor said that the suspension of civil cases would save time and resources, because the results of criminal cases “may have a significant impact on the final controversial issues in civil cases”. At present, the request for postponing the SEC civil action is still pending. According to the previous news, SBF has agreed to suspend the civil case trial, and the lawyers of Gary Wang and Caroline Ellisone, other senior executives of FTX and Alameda, and the lawyers of FTX.com and Alameda’s bankruptcy property also agreed. In addition, SBF refused to plead guilty to the criminal fraud charges against him. The criminal case will be tried in October.

The judge approved to postpone the civil action of CFTC against SBF until the end of the criminal case

Interpretation of the news:


The United States Attorney for the United States Commodity Futures Commission (CFTC) has been granted permission by a judge to request a postponement of the civil action lawsuit against SBF, until the resolution of criminal charges. This development has the potential to save valuable time and resources, as the outcome of the criminal case may significantly impact the final verdict in the civil case. It has been reported that SBF has agreed to suspend the trial of the civil case, along with the lawyers of Gary Wang, Caroline Ellisone, the senior executives of FTX and Alameda, as well as the lawyers of FTX.com and Alameda’s bankruptcy property. However, SBF has refused to plead guilty to the criminal fraud charges against him, with the criminal trial set to take place in October.

The postponement of the civil action lawsuit against SBF is a significant legal development that illustrates the intricate interplay between civil and criminal charges, and the potential consequences of these charges. The decision to delay the civil lawsuit by the prosecutor has demonstrated its belief that the results of the criminal case will have an immense impact on the procedure of the civil case. In deciding to postpone civil action, the US Attorney and a judge are acknowledging the potential for inconsistencies in parallel proceedings and the need to pursue justice most efficiently.

This interpretation illuminates that the legal actions against SBF are far from over, highlighting the possible serious consequences associated with criminal and civil charges. It is an immensely complex and challenging situation, requiring comprehensive legal expertise, which is demonstrated through the opinions of the involved parties. As the legal proceedings unfold against SBF, one can expect several more significant developments to emerge in the public domain, shedding further light on the broader context and implications of these legal events.

This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent Fpips's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.fpips.com/135/

It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.