1. PixelPlaygroundHome
  2. Web3 News

Snapshot Voting Page Shows Chainlink Community Ambassador Opposes AIP-1.05

• Web3 News • 110 views

On April 10th, the snapshot voting page showed that Chainlink Community Ambassador ChainLinkGod-eth voted against AIP-1.05, a proposal by the Arbitrum community to \”return the rema

Snapshot Voting Page Shows Chainlink Community Ambassador Opposes AIP-1.05

On April 10th, the snapshot voting page showed that Chainlink Community Ambassador ChainLinkGod-eth voted against AIP-1.05, a proposal by the Arbitrum community to “return the remaining 700 million ARBs of the foundation to the DAO, And stated in the tweet: I will vote for AIP-1.1 and AIP-1.2 instead of AIP-1.05. The first two AIPs fully addressed my initial concerns about AIP-1, which poses unnecessary risks to DAOs and foundations. I doubt whether this is a credible neutral measure. If some people receive compensation while others do not, it sets a precedent where some may not receive compensation when key rotation occurs. Currently, the AIP-1.05 proposal votes in favor of it The rate is 51.68%, and the opposition rate is 46.72%. The vote will end on April 15th.

ChainLinkGod. eth opposes Arbitrum AIP-1.05, with a current opposition rate of nearly 47%

Introduction

On April 10th, the snapshot voting page showed that Chainlink Community Ambassador ChainLinkGod-eth voted against AIP-1.05, a proposal by the Arbitrum community to “return the remaining 700 million ARBs of the foundation to the DAO. In a tweet, ChainLinkGod-eth stated that he would vote for AIP-1.1 and AIP-1.2 instead of AIP-1.05.

Understanding ChainLinkGod-eth’s Position

The first two AIPs – AIP-1.1 and AIP-1.2 – fully addressed ChainLinkGod-eth’s initial concerns about AIP-1, which he felt posed unnecessary risks to DAOs and foundations. He also doubted whether the proposal was a credible neutral measure. His concern was that if some people receive compensation while others do not, it sets a precedent where some may not receive compensation when key rotation occurs. Hence, ChainLinkGod-eth felt that AIP-1.05 was not the best proposal.

Snapshot Voting Results

Currently, the AIP-1.05 proposal has garnered support from 51.68% of the voters, while the opposition rate stands at 46.72%. The voting process is set to end on April 15th.

Conclusion

ChainLinkGod-eth’s voting against AIP-1.05 indicates the level of detail and care that members of the community apply when participating in the DAO such as Arbitrum. The decentralized nature of DAOs can lead to different opinions, but it fosters transparency and accountability on the way decisions are made.

FAQs

What is AIP-1.05?

AIP-1.05 is a proposal that seeks to return the remaining 700 million ARBs of the Arbitrum Foundation to the DAO.

Why does ChainLinkGod-eth oppose AIP-1.05?

ChainLinkGod-eth opposes AIP-1.05 because he feels that it poses unnecessary risks to DAOs and foundations, and doubts whether the financial proposal is a credible neutral measure.

When will the voting process end?

The voting process will end on April 15th.

This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent Fpips's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.fpips.com/14024/

It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.

Like (0)
Previous 04/10/2023 04:09
Next 04/10/2023 04:44

Recommended articles