On April 21st, Snapshot Voting Page Shows AIP-232 Proposal Was Not Voted Through

On April 21st, the snapshot voting page showed that the AIP-232 proposal by the ApeCoin community to establish a multilingual information center, Apeverse, was not voted through. T

On April 21st, Snapshot Voting Page Shows AIP-232 Proposal Was Not Voted Through

On April 21st, the snapshot voting page showed that the AIP-232 proposal by the ApeCoin community to establish a multilingual information center, Apeverse, was not voted through. The abstention rate of the vote was 54.2%, the opposition rate was 41.85%, and the support rate was only 3.95%. The proposal proposes the creation of a multilingual information center, Apeverse, to serve as a platform for Ape community communication and collaboration, allowing members to submit relevant progress and events to encourage collaboration among members.

ApeCoin’s proposal to establish a multilingual information center, Apeverse, was not voted through

Introduction

On April 21st, a proposal by the ApeCoin community to establish a multilingual information center, Apeverse, was voted on by the community through the Snapshot voting page. The AIP-232 proposal aimed to create Apeverse as a platform for community communication and collaboration, allowing members to submit relevant progress and events to encourage collaboration among members. However, the results of the vote showed that the proposal was not voted through, with an abstention rate of 54.2%, an opposition rate of 41.85%, and a support rate of only 3.95%.

What is Apeverse?

Apeverse is a proposed multilingual information center by the ApeCoin community that aims to serve as a platform for community communication and collaboration. It will be a place where members can submit their relevant progress and events, allowing for easy sharing of information and promoting collaboration among members.

Snapshot Voting

Snapshot voting is a decentralized voting platform used by a number of blockchain projects. It allows for community members to vote on proposals and provides a transparent and secure voting environment. The system allows for voting using tokens held by community members, and proposals are voted on for a set period of time before the results are revealed.

Results of the Vote

The results of the AIP-232 proposal vote were surprising, with an abstention rate of over 50%. This is a significant percentage of the community, and suggests that many members were not interested in or did not understand the proposed Apeverse platform. The opposition rate was higher than the support rate, indicating that more members of the community were against the proposal than in favor of it.

Reasons for the Vote Outcome

There could be many reasons behind the vote outcome for the AIP-232 proposal. It is possible that the proposal was not well understood by the community, or that the proposed platform did not address the needs or desires of the majority of the community. It is also possible that there were concerns about the proposed funding or the management of the platform.

Conclusion

The vote on the AIP-232 proposal by the ApeCoin community to establish a multilingual information center, Apeverse, did not pass. The results of the vote showed a high abstention rate and a higher rate of opposition than support. While the reasons behind the vote outcome are uncertain, it is clear that the community was not overwhelmingly in favor of the proposed platform.

FAQs

1. What is ApeCoin?
– ApeCoin is a cryptocurrency project that aims to create a decentralized financial ecosystem.
2. How long was the voting period for the AIP-232 proposal?
– The voting period for the proposal was not specified in the prompt.
3. Will the ApeCoin community attempt to propose Apeverse again in the future?
– The prompt does not provide information on future proposals.

This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent Fpips's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.fpips.com/17346/

It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.