Vela Exchange and GMX’s Native DEX Projects See Significant Transaction Volumes

On February 21, it was reported that in the past 24 hours, the transaction volume of Vela Exchange, an ecological native DEX project of Arbitrum, reached $341 …

Vela Exchange and GMX’s Native DEX Projects See Significant Transaction Volumes

On February 21, it was reported that in the past 24 hours, the transaction volume of Vela Exchange, an ecological native DEX project of Arbitrum, reached $341 million, while the transaction volume of GMX in the same period reached $111 million (including Arbitrum and Avalanche networks). Vela Exchange is designed with a mechanism similar to GMX and is still in the testing stage.

In the past 24 hours, the turnover of Arbitrum Ecological DEX Vela Exchange has exceeded US $340 million

Interpretation of the news:


The recent report on Vela Exchange and GMX’s native DEX projects draws attention to the growing importance of decentralized exchanges (DEXs) in the cryptocurrency market. According to the report, Vela Exchange, an eco-native DEX project of Arbitrum, recorded a transaction volume of $341 million within 24 hours, while GMX’s recorded transaction volume reached $111 million, which includes both the Arbitrum and Avalanche networks.

It is important to understand the significance of these numbers. DEXs are decentralized exchanges that run on the blockchain network and allow users to trade cryptocurrencies without the need for intermediaries or a centralized authority. A higher transaction volume on DEXs is an indication of the growing trust in the technology and the increasing adoption of cryptocurrencies. The report’s statistics reveal that native DEXs of Vela Exchange and GMX are not experiencing a slow start in their adoption. Instead, they are witnessing considerable transaction volumes.

Vela Exchange and GMX’s native DEX projects have different architectures but quite similar mechanisms. Vela Exchange focuses primarily on providing a more efficient method of trading tokens within the Arbitrum network, while GMX’s primary objective is to improve the underlying technology behind the decentralized exchange networks. Despite their differences, both native DEX projects offer a seamless trading experience for their users while providing an assurance of security and trust in the technology.

Additionally, it is worth noting that the Vela Exchange project is still in its testing phase, which further reinforces the possibility of higher transaction volumes once it is fully launched. This also means that the transaction volume increase is a positive sign for the Vela Exchange team as it shows that the market is interested in their technology, and it is highly possible for them to emerge as a prominent player in the DEX market.

In conclusion, the report on Vela Exchange and GMX native DEX projects indicates a positive trend towards the adoption of DEX technology. As cryptocurrencies continue to gain wider adoption in traditional markets, decentralized exchange technology will become more ubiquitous. Vela Exchange and GMX have demonstrated the potential of their native DEX projects, and it will be exciting to see how they evolve and impact the decentralized exchange ecosystem in the coming years.

This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent Fpips's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.fpips.com/1992/

It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.