Unsecured creditor of Genesis raises concern with intercompany transactions

It is reported that according to a court document released on February 20, the unsecured creditor of Genesis raised an objection to the company\’s request to co…

Unsecured creditor of Genesis raises concern with intercompany transactions

It is reported that according to a court document released on February 20, the unsecured creditor of Genesis raised an objection to the company’s request to continue the intercompany transaction. They believe that the request of Genesis has caused the concern of the creditor committee, because the intercompany transaction of Genesis has been investigated before, and no relevant information such as the address of the encrypted wallet has been provided so far, so they hope that the court will prohibit the company from conducting all intercompany transactions and require it to “provide necessary reports and information to track the cash outflow and the flow of the debtor’s digital assets, including the address of the encrypted wallet”. (cryptoslate)

Creditors apply to the court to restrict Genesis from conducting intercompany transactions

Interpretation of the news:


The above message suggests that an unsecured creditor of Genesis has raised an objection to the company’s request to continue its intercompany transactions. The objection was made on the grounds that previous investigations into the transactions had found no information relating to the address of the encrypted wallet. The creditor committee is concerned that without the necessary information, it will be difficult to track the cash outflow and the flow of the debtor’s digital assets.

The unsecured creditor’s objection suggests that there are doubts about the transparency of Genesis’ intercompany transactions. The lack of information about the address of the encrypted wallet raises questions about the company’s ability to manage digital assets in a safe and secure way. The request to prohibit all intercompany transactions and require the company to provide reports and information is seen as an attempt to increase transparency and ensure the company is held accountable for its transactions.

It’s important to note that the objection doesn’t indicate any wrongdoings by Genesis. However, the concern about transparency suggests that there may be underlying issues that need to be addressed. The creditor committee’s request highlights the importance of accountability and transparency in digital asset management.

The message shows that even in the world of digital assets, traditional business practices such as transparency and accountability still hold value. It also suggests that companies operating in this space need to be aware of the increasing scrutiny and need for transparency by stakeholders.

In conclusion, the unsecured creditor’s objection to Genesis’ intercompany transactions highlights the growing concerns about transparency and accountability in digital asset management. Companies operating in this space need to be aware of this trend and take steps to increase transparency and accountability to maintain the confidence of stakeholders.

This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent Fpips's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.fpips.com/2124/

It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.