1. PixelPlaygroundHome
  2. Metaverse Insights

Dapper’s Argument Dismissed: Top Shot NFT Moments Considered Securities

• Metaverse Insights • 102 views

It is reported that Dapper tried to dismiss the lawsuit filed against the company for violating the securities law when providing NBA Top Shot NFT Moments. Vic…

Dappers Argument Dismissed: Top Shot NFT Moments Considered Securities

It is reported that Dapper tried to dismiss the lawsuit filed against the company for violating the securities law when providing NBA Top Shot NFT Moments. Victor Marrero, a federal judge in Manhattan, rejected Dapper’s motion of rejection because he found that the argument of marking Top Shot NFT as a security was reasonable, which was the first time in this new technology.

Legal expert: The judge’s judgment is a very good decision in the lawsuit filed against Dapper’s accusation of violating the securities law

Interpretation of the news:


Dapper, the company responsible for creating the NBA Top Shot NFT Moments, is facing a lawsuit for violating the securities law. The company sought to dismiss the lawsuit on the grounds that the NFTs are not securities, but federal judge Victor Marrero rejected the motion. The judge found that the argument for the NFTs marking as securities was reasonable, which is a significant ruling in the new technology of NFTs.

NFTs, or non-fungible tokens, are unique digital assets that can be bought, sold, and traded like traditional securities. In the case of NBA Top Shot, fans can purchase NFT versions of iconic basketball moments such as dunks or game-winning shots. These NFTs can then be sold or traded, with some fetching prices in the millions of dollars.

However, the lawsuit alleges that Dapper did not register the NFTs as securities with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, violating federal securities law. Dapper argued that NFTs are not securities because they do not represent ownership in a company or investment scheme. Instead, they are collectibles or digital memorabilia.

Judge Marrero, however, believed that the argument was not convincing enough to dismiss the lawsuit. He stated that the nature of the NBA Top Shot NFT Moments could be interpreted as an investment contract, which would classify them as securities. The judge’s decision means that Dapper will have to face the lawsuit and defend itself against allegations of violating federal securities laws.

This decision is significant for the NFT industry as a whole. NFTs have exploded in popularity in recent months, with millions of dollars being invested in them every day. However, the legal status of NFTs is still murky, and this ruling could pave the way for more regulation and oversight of the industry.

In conclusion, the ruling against Dapper’s argument highlights the ambiguity surrounding the legal status of NFTs. The decision to classify the NBA Top Shot NFT Moments as securities and to proceed with the lawsuit demonstrates that there is a growing need for regulation and oversight in the NFT industry. The keywords that best summarize this message are Dapper, lawsuit, securities law, NBA Top Shot NFT Moments, federal judge, and reasoning.

This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent Fpips's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.fpips.com/3255/

It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.

Like (0)
Previous 02/25/2023 04:38
Next 02/25/2023 05:03

Recommended articles