1. PixelPlaygroundHome
  2. Web3 News

The Modern Caste System in the US Banking System

• Web3 News • 106 views

The Modern Caste System in the US Banking System

According to reports, Professor Gemini and co founder Tyler Winklevoss wrote on social media that the US banking system is a modern caste system, and only those who have access to head banking services will be protected, while others will face risks. He pointed out that Bank of America is actually a type bank, a regional bank, and a bank without bank accounts, The US government considers systemically important financial institutions (SIFIs) to be “too big to fail”, while banks that are “not worth enough” may not be protected. The US government has had to step in to save customers at Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) because its failure could have a catastrophic impact on the broader financial landscape.

Gemini founder Tyler Winklevoss: The American banking system is a modern caste system

Analysis based on this information:


The message suggests that the US banking system is a modern caste system where only those who have access to head banking services will be protected, while others face risks. It highlights that the government considers some banks too big to fail and hence systemically important, while others are not worth protection, leading to the creation of a hierarchy within the banking industry.

The statement made by Professor Gemini and Tyler Winklevoss reveals how the US banking system operates. It emphasizes the importance of having access to head banking services to ensure complete protection from risks. The duo has called the banking system a modern caste system, which means that the industry is divided into different levels based on access to services. This division results in creating a hierarchical structure within the banking industry, with those who have access to head banking services being at the top of the pyramid.

Gemini also points out that Bank of America is actually a type bank and a regional bank, and it does not consider the same category as some of the more prominent banks in the US banking system. This implies that Bank of America customers may not be as protected as those of more prominent banks.

The authors further state that the systemically important financial institutions (SIFIs) are the ones that are considered “too big to fail” and are worth protecting by the government. On the other hand, some banks may not be considered significant enough to protect. This implies that ordinary customers of smaller banks may not receive government support, and they may bear the brunt of potential losses.

Lastly, the message reveals that the US government has had to intervene to save Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) customers, who could have faced a catastrophic impact if the bank had failed. This highlights the potential risks that ordinary customers face when banking with banks that are not considered systemically important.

In conclusion, the message suggests that the US banking system has created a modern caste system, where only those with access to head banking services receive complete protection. Customers who bank with smaller banks may not enjoy the same status and risk losing their money if the bank fails. The government only considers systemically important financial institutions “too big to fail,” leaving other banks vulnerable.

This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent Fpips's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.fpips.com/6027/

It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.

Like (0)
Previous 03/19/2023 04:29
Next 03/19/2023 05:20

Recommended articles