1. PixelPlaygroundHome
  2. Metaverse Insights

Tether Claims No Exposure to Signature Bank While the US Treasury Compensates Their Savers

• Metaverse Insights • 103 views

Tether Claims No Exposure to Signature Bank While the US Treasury Compensates Their Savers

On March 13, Tether Chief Technology Officer Paolo Ardoino tweeted that Tether had no exposure to Signature Bank. According to the previous news, Signature Bank was closed by New York State regulators on Sunday. The Federal Reserve, the FDIC and the US Treasury issued a joint statement saying that all savers who use Signature will be compensated.

Tether CTO: Tether has no exposure to Signature Bank

Analysis based on this information:


Recently, Tether Chief Technology Officer Paolo Ardoino tweeted that Tether had no exposure to Signature Bank. Reports had emerged that the bank was closed by New York State regulators on Sunday. Ardoino’s tweet seems to imply that Tether has no reason to be concerned about the situation.

However, the situation at Signature Bank is not without its silver lining. The Federal Reserve, FDIC, and US Treasury have issued a joint statement saying that all savers who use Signature Bank will be compensated. This move is likely to restore confidence among savers in the banking system.

Tether, on the other hand, does not seem to be directly affected by the closure of Signature Bank. As a provider of a stable coin, Tether works to maintain the stability of its coin. This stability is important to those who use Tether to hold their savings, as it is an alternative to highly volatile cryptocurrency markets.

Tether’s claim of no exposure to Signature Bank is notable considering its own recent troubles. In February, the company settled a lawsuit claiming that it had a role in manipulating the price of Bitcoin. This settlement came amid growing pressure from US regulators, who have long been concerned about the unregulated nature of cryptocurrency markets.

It is worth noting that Tether has been the subject of controversy in the past. Critics have claimed that the company’s assets do not match the number of Tether coins in circulation. While the company has maintained that it has enough reserves to back its coin, the lack of transparency around Tether’s assets has raised questions.

In conclusion, while Tether seems to be unconcerned about the closure of Signature Bank, the move by the Federal Reserve, FDIC, and US Treasury to compensate savers is a positive development for the banking system. Tether’s claim of no exposure to Signature Bank is notable, given its own recent legal and regulatory troubles. However, uncertainties about Tether’s asset reserves remain a concern for some.

Overall, the closure of Signature Bank and the US Treasury’s compensation of savers underscores the importance of transparency and stability in the banking and cryptocurrency markets.

Word count: 394

This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent Fpips's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.fpips.com/7773/

It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.

Like (0)
Previous 03/13/2023 00:43
Next 03/13/2023 00:48

Recommended articles