1. PixelPlaygroundHome
  2. Web3 News

MakerDAO’s Future Governance: Centralized or Decentralized?

• Web3 News • 118 views

On February 16, Hasu, the strategic director of Flashbots and the strategic consultant of Lido Finance, forwarded a message on social media that a series of pr…

MakerDAOs Future Governance: Centralized or Decentralized?

On February 16, Hasu, the strategic director of Flashbots and the strategic consultant of Lido Finance, forwarded a message on social media that a series of proposals of MakerDAO next month may make the agreement more centralized, and the future agreement governance may be in the charge of more than a dozen council and committee members. Hasu said that Rune Christensen, the founder of MakerDAO, was no longer suitable to lead Maker alone. The encryption industry was in urgent need of decentralized stable currency, but there was still no reliable alternative to DAI. MKR representatives needed to be organized, and MKR holders could no longer be silent.

Lido Finance consultant: There will be many proposals to make Maker more centralized in March

Interpretation of the news:


In a social media message on February 16, 2021, Hasu, the strategic director of Flashbots and the strategic consultant of Lido Finance, expressed concerns about the proposed changes in MakerDAO’s governance. MakerDAO is a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) that operates on the Ethereum blockchain and issues the stablecoin DAI. The DAO’s governance framework relies on the election of representatives by MKR token holders who make decisions on behalf of the community. However, Hasu warned that a series of proposals to be discussed next month could make the agreement more centralized and give rise to a governance structure controlled by a dozen council and committee members.

Hasu’s criticism was mainly addressed to Rune Christensen, the founder of MakerDAO. According to Hasu, Christensen was no longer suitable to lead Maker alone, and his dominance could undermine the DAO’s decentralized ethos. Hasu argued that the cryptocurrency industry urgently needed a decentralized stable currency, and DAI was currently the most trustworthy solution available. However, if the MakerDAO governance became centralized, it could significantly reduce the community’s trust in the DAO and result in the loss of its key users.

Hasu called on MKR representatives to organize and stand up for their rights, stressing that MKR holders could no longer stay silent. MakerDAO’s governance model has always been a hot topic of debate. Some argue that a more centralized structure is necessary to ensure efficient decision-making, while others contend that only a decentralized framework can preserve the DAO’s ideology and values. MakerDAO’s upcoming proposal would severely affect both the structure and direction of the DAO, making it undoubtedly crucial for the community to voice its opinion.

In conclusion, Hasu’s social media message was a call to recognize the crucial role of decentralized governance in MakerDAO’s success. The title of the message implied that the future governance of MakerDAO was still uncertain, and the community’s voice would determine its direction. The three keywords associated with the message were MakerDAO, Governance, and Decentralization. These terms encapsulate the themes of the message and suggest that MakerDAO’s future will depend on how its governance model balances centralization and decentralization to ensure that its users’ interests are protected.

This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent Fpips's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.fpips.com/903/

It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.

Like (0)
Previous 02/16/2023 07:37
Next 02/16/2023 07:41

Recommended articles