Clarification on United States Securities Law and Encrypted Assets

According to reports, Gary Gensler, chairman of the United States Securities Commission, reiterated in a recent interview with New York magazine (NYMAG) that a…

Clarification on United States Securities Law and Encrypted Assets

According to reports, Gary Gensler, chairman of the United States Securities Commission, reiterated in a recent interview with New York magazine (NYMAG) that all encrypted assets and all transactions are subject to the United States securities law, except for Bitcoin spot transactions.

Lawyer of Blockchain Association: Gensler’s remarks or opinions are not laws, and SEC has no right to supervise any of them

Interpretation of the news:


Gary Gensler’s recent interview with New York Magazine sheds light on the United States Securities Law and the regulation of encrypted assets. According to Gensler, all encrypted assets and transactions fall under the jurisdiction of United States securities law, with the exception of Bitcoin spot transactions.

This statement is significant as it clarifies the SEC’s stance on regulating the growing market of encrypted assets. Encrypted assets, also known as cryptocurrencies, have become increasingly popular in recent years as more individuals and businesses explore their potential use as an alternative to traditional currencies.

However, as encrypted assets are not regulated by a central authority, there has been uncertainty about how they should be classified and regulated under United States law. Gensler’s statement provides much-needed clarity on the SEC’s position on this matter.

Gensler’s statement is not entirely unexpected. The SEC has been actively pursuing regulatory action in the encrypted asset market and has filed numerous lawsuits against companies and individuals for violating securities laws. The SEC’s stance is that any encrypted asset that meets the definition of a security is subject to regulation under United States securities law.

The exception of Bitcoin spot transactions from this classification is also significant. Bitcoin is the largest and most established cryptocurrency, and its status as a non-security is a recognition of its unique characteristics as a decentralized digital currency. This classification is expected to have implications for other cryptocurrencies, as it sets a precedent for what types of cryptocurrencies may fall under the SEC’s jurisdiction.

In conclusion, Gensler’s statement provides much-needed clarity on the SEC’s position on the regulation of encrypted assets. The classification of all encrypted assets as subject to United States securities law, with the exception of Bitcoin spot transactions, has significant implications for the crypto market and its potential for regulatory oversight. Companies and individuals operating in this space should pay close attention to developments in this area to ensure compliance with applicable regulations.

This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent Fpips's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.fpips.com/3669/

It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.