Signature Bank’s Closure Expels Cryptocurrency from Mainstream Banking

Signature Bank’s Closure Expels Cryptocurrency from Mainstream Banking

According to the report, Frank Chaparo, the chief editor of The Block News, tweeted that the Crypto Friendly Bank Signature Bank was closed, and the crypto capital market basically returned to 2014. Any newly established company had no opportunity to establish a relationship with the bank. In many ways, cryptocurrency has become a formal non-bank business.

Viewpoint: The crypto capital market is basically back to 2014, and startups no longer have the opportunity to cooperate with banks

Analysis based on this information:


The world of cryptocurrency has been dealt a major blow as Signature Bank, one of the most crypto-friendly banks in the United States, has reportedly ceased to provide services to investors and traders in the cryptocurrency industry. Frank Chaparo, the chief editor of The Block News, took to Twitter to announce the unfortunate news, which has left many participants in the crypto capital market feeling as though they have been thrown back to the year 2014.

What does it mean for the cryptocurrency market to become a “formal non-bank business”? The lack of support and services from mainstream banks means that crypto investors and traders must rely on alternative financial services providers. Unfortunately, these alternatives tend to be riskier and more expensive than traditional banking solutions. As a result, the cost of doing business for crypto firms increases, and startups may struggle to establish themselves since they lack the financial backing of established institutions.

The lack of banking services extends beyond just digital currencies themselves. Those who facilitate trades, such as broker-dealers and exchanges, are also being shut out of mainstream banking. This includes entities like Coinbase and Gemini, two of the largest and most established cryptocurrency exchanges in the world.

The closure of Signature Bank’s services to the crypto industry could lead to a significant shift in how businesses approach raising capital as they are forced to rely on new and untested fundraising models. The reported closure of the bank’s services to the cryptocurrency industry could indicate that more traditional financial institutions will follow suit over the next few years. The potential implication of this is that established banks are viewing cryptocurrency as too risky and not “mainstream” enough yet to warrant their investment of time and resources.

In conclusion, cryptocurrency businesses must navigate a challenging financial landscape with respect to mainstream banking. Without the support of traditional financial institutions, crypto investors and traders may have to look to various alternative solutions. As cryptocurrencies continue to establish themselves as a legitimate asset class, the banking industry will be forced to re-evaluate their positions on providing services to this emerging market.

In summary, Signature Bank’s departure from the crypto industry may have significant implications for the future of cryptocurrency trading and investment. The keywords that best encapsulate the essence of the story are Signature Bank, Cryptocurrency, Formal Non-Bank Business, and Mainstream Banking.

This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent Fpips's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.fpips.com/7779/

It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.